Blockchain App Maker is an independent guide, and it gets better when people who build these systems point out what's wrong or missing. If you're an engineer, auditor, lawyer, researcher or operator, there are three useful ways to contribute.
This page replaces the old partner program at this address. There is no reseller, referral or agency partnership here; the site doesn't sell development services. What it does want is expertise.
Three ways to contribute
1. Suggest a correction
Blockchain moves fast. Tokens migrate, protocols rebrand, regulators publish new rules, and a guide that was right last year can be wrong today. If you spot an error, tell us:
- the page URL and the exact sentence that's wrong;
- what's correct, ideally with a primary source such as official docs, an EIP, a regulator's publication or the project's own repository;
- whether you have any connection to the project involved.
Corrections that are verifiable are usually the fastest to go live. Pages show an "updated" date so readers can see when something was last reviewed.
2. Propose a guide
If there's a topic the site doesn't cover well, such as a chain's tooling, a security pattern, or a category like account abstraction wallets, send a short proposal: the question the guide would answer, who it's for, and an outline. Good proposals explain mechanics rather than promote anything. Look at the existing smart contract development guide or the article on why audits matter to get a feel for the depth expected.
3. Share expertise for review
Practitioners can also offer to review drafts in their area: an auditor checking a security section, a compliance specialist checking a regulatory summary, a game developer checking a GameFi explainer. Reviewers can be credited by name if they wish, and their affiliation is disclosed alongside the credit.
Editorial standards
Every contribution is held to the same rules as the rest of the site. They exist to keep the guides useful to readers rather than to whoever submits them.
- No paid links, ever. The site doesn't sell links, sponsored placements or "guest posts". Offers to pay for inclusion are declined.
- No promotional submissions. Content that exists to promote a company, token, launchpad or service won't be published. Mentioning your own project is fine when it's genuinely the best example, but it must be disclosed and isn't guaranteed to stay in.
- Disclose conflicts. If you work for, advise, hold tokens in, or are paid by a project you write about, say so. Undisclosed conflicts disqualify a contribution.
- Primary sources. Claims should trace back to documentation, code, standards or regulators, not to press releases or marketing pages.
- No invented numbers. Statistics, user counts and market sizes need a verifiable source; estimates must show their assumptions.
- Not advice. Legal, tax and investment topics are written as general information, with a clear note saying so.
- Editorial control stays here. Contributions may be edited for accuracy, clarity, length and tone, or not used at all.
What makes a contribution useful
| Helpful | Not helpful |
|---|---|
| "This page says X; the official docs at this link say Y." | "Your page is outdated, check our website." |
| A worked example of a vulnerability class with a fix | A list of reasons to hire a particular auditor |
| A neutral comparison of three wallet SDKs | An article about one SDK written by its vendor |
| Regulatory summary citing the regulator's own text | Commentary on which token will rise next |
How to get in touch
Send corrections, proposals and review offers through the contact page. Put "Correction", "Guide proposal" or "Reviewer" in the subject so it reaches the right queue. You can read more about how the site works on the about page.
Not every message gets a reply, but every factual correction is checked.
What happens after you send something
Each correction is checked against the source you provide and, where possible, a second independent source. If it holds up, the page is updated and its date changes. Guide proposals are weighed against what readers search for and what the site already covers; overlapping proposals may be folded into an existing guide instead. If your proposal or review is used, you'll be asked how, or whether, you'd like to be credited.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a paid partner or referral program?
No. The site has no reseller, referral or affiliate partnerships, and it doesn't build software for clients.
Can I write a guest post that links to my company?
Not as a promotional placement. Contributions are judged on usefulness to readers, and links are added only when they point to primary sources that support a claim.
Will I be credited?
If you want to be. Reviewers and contributors can be named with their affiliation disclosed; you can also contribute anonymously.
How quickly are corrections made?
There's no fixed timeline. Corrections backed by a primary source are prioritized.